<![CDATA[Rep. Tim Greimels' Site Feed]]> http://029.housedems.com <![CDATA[House Dems Form Task Force to Improve Veterans Services]]> http://029.housedems.com/news/article/house-dems-form-task-force-to-improve-veterans-services <p>LANSING — House Democratic Leader Tim Greimel (D-Auburn Hills) announced today that the Michigan House Democrats have formed a task force that will help veterans access the services and health care they deserve.</p> <p>&#8220;As we approach Memorial Day, when we honor brave service members who have made the ultimate sacrifice for our country, my fellow Democrats and I are committed to making sure these brave men and women get all the recognition they deserve,&#8221; Greimel said. &#8220;We owe it to serving veterans to ensure they receive needed benefits and quality care after their service is over.&#8221;</p> <p>During the budget process, Republicans made clear that any stated claim of helping Michigan veterans is simply lip service. Democrats offered amendments that would have provided funding for mental health care for veterans and increased safeguards against maltreatment at veterans homes, but Republicans voted them down. In response, House Democrats have formed a task force to speak to vets directly and find out how the state can serve them better.</p> <p>The co-chairmen of the task force are veterans themselves: state Representative David Knezek (D-Dearborn Heights), who served two tours in the Marine Corps in the Iraq War, and Rep. Harvey Santana (D-Detroit), a Navy veteran who served during Operation Desert Storm. Other members of the task force are Reps. George T. Darany (D-Dearborn), Andrew Kandrevas (D-Southgate), Marilyn Lane (D-Fraser), Charles Smiley (D-Burton) and Henry Yanez (D-Sterling Heights).</p> <p>&#8220;It was insulting to see those amendments that would have done so much good for our state&#8217;s veterans get voted down on the House floor. Clearly, House Republicans only support vets when they think someone&#8217;s watching,&#8221; Greimel said. &#8220;If they refuse to do what&#8217;s right for our brave men and women, Democrats will reach out to veterans directly and do everything we can to get them the service they deserve.&#8221;</p> <![CDATA[Statement from House Democratic Leader Tim Greimel on the appointment of Rep. David E. Rutledge (D-Ypsilanti) to serve as the Democratic Floor Leader]]> http://029.housedems.com/news/article/statement-from-house-democratic-leader-tim-greimel-on-the-appointment-of-rep-david-e-rutledge-d-ypsilanti-to-serve-as-the-democratic-floor-leader <p>&#8220;The House Democratic Caucus selected Rep. David E. Rutledge (D-Ypsilanti) to serve as the House Democratic floor leader today. I look forward to partnering with David to work on priorities that matter to Michigan families, such as providing tax relief and economic security to Michigan families and investing in education. David has been a tireless supporter of Michigan&#8217;s middle class families, students and seniors, and I&#8217;m confident that he will work hard on behalf of all Michiganders.&#8221;</p> <![CDATA[Democrats Demand Revenues Go To Schools, Families, Cities]]> http://029.housedems.com/news/article/democrats-demand-revenues-go-to-schools-families-cities <p>LANSING -?? House Democratic Leader <strong>Tim Greimel</strong> (D-Auburn Hills) and state Representative <strong>Rashida H Tlaib</strong> (D-Detroit), Democratic vice chairwoman of the House Appropriations Committee, said today the House Republicans and Gov. Rick Snyder should be using the increased revenues the state will take in this year to increase funding for schools, help Michigan&#8217;s middle-class families and help cash-strapped cities provide services such as police and fire protection. The additional revenue figures were announced today at the Consensus Revenue Estimating Conference held in Lansing.</p> <p>&#8220;I think that it&#8217;s clear where these additional revenues should go: to tax relief for struggling middle-class families and to our schools that have been trying to educate our kids after having nearly $2 billion of their funding cut over the past two years,&#8221; said Greimel. &#8220;In order to turn our economy around, we need to reinvest in families and schools that have borne the brunt of Republican tax hikes and education cuts.&#8221;</p> <p>Both the Senate and House Fiscal Agencies announced better-than-expected revenues for the state, with the House Fiscal Agency&#8217;s (HFA) estimates slightly lower than those of the Senate Fiscal Agency (SFA). The revenue estimating conference said today that the state can expect $482.6 million more combined General Fund and School Aid Fund revenue in FY 2013 and $219.3 million combined General Fund and School Aid Fund revenue in FY 2014 compared the January estimates.</p> <p>&#8220;Schools are closing early this year and the Education Achievement Authority operating in Detroit is diverting state funds away from school districts because it can&#8217;t pay its bills, so I think it&#8217;s painfully clear that a portion of this money is desperately needed to save our students,&#8221; said Tlaib.</p> <p>House Democrats&#8217; priorities remain those that were outlined earlier this year: protecting seniors and veterans, giving real tax relief to struggling families and seniors hit hard with the senior retirement tax and increasing funding to severely underfunded schools. Republicans have so far this year turned down Democratic efforts to fund Meals on Wheels for seniors, increase funding to local communities to keep police officers on the streets and firefighters on the job, increase the per-pupil funding for students, increase funding for Great Start early childhood enrollment, protect veterans by funding substance abuse and mental health treatment and failed to strengthen protections against abuse and neglect at the state&#8217;s veterans homes. The state&#8217;s most vulnerable children also would suffer under the proposed budget which cuts hundreds of necessary workers who would protect children from abuse and neglect.</p> <p>&#8220;Turning Michigan&#8217;s economy around depends on keeping our communities and families strong and properly educating our kids so they can be successful,&#8221; said Greimel. &#8220;This money came from Michigan taxpayers and we should return it to them in the form of sorely needed tax relief and funding for their kids&#8217; schools.&#8221;</p> <![CDATA[Legislation Improving Access to Women's Health Care Backed by Dem Leader Greimel and Ingham Dems]]> http://029.housedems.com/multimedia/videos/legislation-improving-access-to-women-s-health-care-backed-by-dem-leader-greimel-and-ingham-dems <p>House Democratic Leader Tim Greimel (D-Auburn Hills) and state Representatives Marcia Hovey-Wright (D-Muskegon), Tom Cochran (D-Mason), Andy Schor (D-Lansing) and Sam Singh (D-East Lansing) announced their support for a package of four bills and three resolutions that would improve access to women’s health care, educate women about health care options, support rape survivors and address health care inequities women face.</p> <![CDATA[Legislation Improving Access to Women's Health Care Backed by Dem Leader Greimel and Ingham Dems]]> http://029.housedems.com/news/article/legislation-improving-access-to-women-s-health-care-backed-by-dem-leader-greimel-and-ingham-dems <p>LANSING - House Democratic Leader <strong>Tim Greimel</strong> (D-Auburn Hills) and state Representatives <strong>Marcia Hovey-Wright</strong> (D-Muskegon), <strong>Tom Cochran</strong> (D-Mason), <strong>Andy Schor</strong> (D-Lansing) and <strong>Sam Singh</strong> (D-East Lansing) announced their support for a package of four bills and three resolutions that would improve access to women&#8217;s health care, educate women about health care options, support rape survivors and address health care inequities women face.</p> <p>&#8220;We have all heard from women and their families across Michigan that they need better access to women&#8217;s health care services,&#8221; said Greimel. &#8220;This legislative package puts women&#8217;s health care issues front and center where they should be. It says that our mothers, wives, sisters, daughters and all the women in our lives deserve the best health care possible and that House Democrats will fight to see that they get it.&#8221;</p> <p>&#8220;These bills aim to fix the problems that too many women experience in the health care system.&#8221; said Cochran.</p> <p>The package of legislation includes:</p> <ul> <li><p>House Resolution 140, naming May 12-18 &#8220;National Women&#8217;s Health Week&#8221; in Michigan (introduced by Rep. Gretchen Driskell)</p></li> <li><p>HR 138, urging the DCH to promote programs that identify and address inequities in the prevention, treatment and research of diseases threatening women (Rep. Winnie Brinks)</p></li> <li><p>HR 139, recommending that the state intensify efforts to reduce the rate of teen pregnancies (Rep. Collene Lamonte)</p></li> <li><p>House Bill 4067, requiring all health facilities and agencies to offer emergency contraception to rape survivors (Rep. Charles Smiley)</p></li> <li><p>HB 4722, which directs the Department of Community Health (DCH) to develop and disseminate information about emergency contraception, including a description, explanation of use, safety efficacy and availability of emergency contraception (Rep. Marcia Hovey-Wright)</p></li> <li><p>HB 4721, requiring age-appropriate, medically accurate and objective sexuality education to be taught in public schools (Rep. Jeff Irwin)</p></li> <li><p>HB 4260, requiring doctors to give information on breast density and give notice to women who have dense breast tissue that they may want to seek further testing (Rep. Winnie Brinks)</p></li> </ul> <p>&#8220;This package of legislation will significantly improve women&#8217;s access to health care, and the information that is available to girls and women of all ages,&#8221; said Singh. &#8220;Health care is a woman&#8217;s right and she shouldn&#8217;t have to break down barriers to get the care she needs. These bills address a critical need in Michigan and should be quickly approved and signed into law.&#8221;</p> <p>&#8220;These proposals go a long way toward addressing women&#8217;s health concerns in Michigan,&#8221; said Schor. &#8220;I continually hear that the Legislature and state need to do more to address women&#8217;s health. These common sense proposals show that women&#8217;s health is a top priority for Michigan and we are ready to proactively address the problems that need to be faced by women in our own families and all Michigan women.&#8221;</p> <![CDATA[Greimel Calls Republican Medicaid Alternative Heartless, Irresponsible]]> http://029.housedems.com/news/article/greimel-calls-republican-medicaid-alternative-heartless-irresponsible <p>LANSING – House Democratic Leader Tim Greimel (D-Auburn Hills) condemned a Republican plan to gut Medicaid expansion unveiled Thursday, criticizing it for offering only token assistance to people in desperate need of health care while requiring working poor families to spend up to 5 percent of their annual income on a watered-down health plan. The plan relies wholly on federal dollars and would end as soon as the state would have to contribute a single cent to help Michiganders, possibly allowing the state to lose out on hundreds of millions of federally matched dollars.</p> <p>&#8220;This plan is a slap in the face to anyone in desperate need of health care who had hoped our state would do the reasonable thing and accept federal funds to expand Medicaid,&#8221; Greimel said. &#8220;We should have done the responsible thing and accepted federal funds to pay for Medicaid expansion, bringing health care to 400,000 Michigan residents who currently have none. Instead, Republicans want some of our most struggling families to pay 5 percent of their annual income to get limited access to health care for a short time only — while insisting the state never contribute a single penny to the program Republicans proposed. It&#8217;s heartless, irresponsible and an insult to the people of Michigan.&#8221;</p> <p>The Republican plan would cut non-disabled people off of the plan after 48 months of care. It would also expect families that fall within 133 percent of the federal poverty line to pay up to 5 percent of their income a year to access the substandard plan.</p> <p>&#8220;Medical conditions like diabetes, multiple sclerosis and emphysema don&#8217;t magically disappear after four years, but the &#8216;help&#8217; being offered by Republicans does,&#8221; Greimel said. &#8220;And when an adult earns just $15,281a year — 133 percent of the federal poverty level — they need every dollar to go toward paying rent, buying groceries and utilities. They can&#8217;t afford to pay 5 percent of their income for a mediocre health plan. The Republican plan is shameful. We can do better than this.&#8221;</p> <![CDATA[House Dems Announce Caucus Stance Against Auto No-Fault]]> http://029.housedems.com/multimedia/videos/house-dems-announce-caucus-stance-against-auto-no-fault <p> House Democratic Leader Tim Greimel (D-Auburn Hills), Democratic vice chairwoman of the House Insurance Committee Rep. Kate Segal (D-Battle Creek) and other members of the House Democratic Caucus announced today that the entire caucus vehemently opposes House Bill 4612, legislation that cuts the amount of care available to those catastrophically injured in auto accidents and locks in an insurance premium rate cut for only one year.</p> <![CDATA[House Dems Announce Caucus Stance Against Auto No-Fault]]> http://029.housedems.com/news/article/house-dems-announce-caucus-stance-against-auto-no-fault <p> LANSING &mdash; House Democratic Leader <strong>Tim Greimel</strong> (D-Auburn Hills), Democratic vice chairwoman of the House Insurance Committee Rep. <strong>Kate Segal</strong> (D-Battle Creek) and other members of the House Democratic Caucus announced today that the entire caucus vehemently opposes House Bill 4612, legislation that cuts the amount of care available to those catastrophically injured in auto accidents and locks in an insurance premium rate cut for only one year.</p> <p> &ldquo;This is a bill that every member of our caucus agrees would hurt the residents we represent,&rdquo; said Greimel. &ldquo;It is clear to each of our members that this is another example of Gov. Rick Snyder and some legislative Republicans choosing big corporations over Michigan residents, and this time insurance companies win over the catastrophically injured. As Democrats, we put people before profits, a concept the Republican majority cannot fathom.&rdquo;</p> <p> Under the bill, there would be a $1 million cap placed on personal protection insurance (PIP) coverage for policies issued or renewed after December 31, 2013. There would also be new limits on rehabilitative care and new co-pay costs on those receiving attendant care.</p> <p> &ldquo;As the Democratic vice chairwoman of the House Insurance Committee, I have had the opportunity to hear testimony from doctors, insurance providers and numerous Michigan residents about the ways in which this bill would harm the people of our state,&rdquo; said Segal. &ldquo;Those who are injured in catastrophic auto accidents deserve every bit of care currently available to them; to limit the amount and types of benefits to which they are entitled is cruel. This bill guts the benefits and opportunities our current system provides to accident victims, thereby completely undermining future victims&rsquo; recovery before it even starts.&rdquo;</p> <p> On top of the benefits cap, the bill would also phase out the Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association (MCCA) and replace it with the Michigan Catastrophic Claims Corporation (MCCC), another private entity. The MCCA would continue to pay its current claims until it pays its final liability. It would remain shielded from making any new disclosures about its use of the money collected from Michigan citizens.</p> <p> Under the bill, motorists would still pay a yearly fee set by and paid to the MCCC, plus an additional $25 that would go to a Medicaid fund. Although certain disclosures are required, as a private entity, the new MCCC would not be subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).</p> <p> &ldquo;Republicans are trying to fool Michigan residents by claiming this bill is necessary to reduce the cost of auto insurance. Unfortunately for them, we know how to read,&rdquo; said Rep. <strong>Thomas Stallworth</strong> (D-Detroit), chairman of the House Detroit Caucus. &ldquo;As written, HB 4612 only promises an annual rate reduction of $125 for the first year. Following that year, insurance agencies can raise the rates at their discretion. This reform does not benefit Michiganders, it was written to increase profits in the insurance sector.&rdquo;</p> <p> Additionally, this week the House Detroit Caucus unanimously voted to oppose the legislation as well.</p>